Memorandum

City of Lawrence

Department of Utilities

 

TO:

Dave Corliss, City Manager

Diane Stoddard, Assistant City Manager

Cynthia Boecker, Assistant City Manager

FROM:

Mike Lawless, Assistant Director of Utilities

CC:

Dave Wagner, Director of Utilities

Philip Ciesielski – Assistant Director of Utilities

Beth Frailey Krishtalka – Assistant Director of Utilities

Ed Mullins, Finance Director

DATE:

July 23, 2009

RE:

Utilities Department 2010 Water & Wastewater Rates

 

After receiving comments from the City Commission Budget Study Session and direction from City Manager’s Office, two (2) reduced budget scenarios were prepared to compare the impacts to water revenue and overall monthly utility bill increases. The scenarios are as follows:

 

  1. Option A – City Manager Recommended Budget (Rate Model Plan 2009 E)
  2. Option B - $2.0 million reduction in O&M Budget Request
  3. Option C - $996,000 reduction in O&M Budget Request

 

The table below summarizes the budget reduction and the increase in water revenues associated with each option.

 

Option

Budget Request Reduction ($)

Water
Revenue Increase

Wastewater Revenue Increase

Combined Revenue Increase

A

0

13.0%

0.0%

5.7%

B

           2,006,658

8.0%

0.0%

3.5%

C

              996,206

10.0%

0.0%

4.4%




 


 

Option A

 

Option B

 

Option C

 

-

 

Reduction

New Total

 

Reduction

New Total

Personal Services

   7,783,188

 

       535,852

   7,247,336

 

     186,852

   7,596,336

Contractual Services

   5,275,800

 

       391,000

   4,884,800

 

     130,000

   5,145,800

Commodities

   3,557,425

 

       354,000

   3,203,425

 

       83,500

   3,473,925

Capital Outlay

      647,000

 

       340,000

      307,000

 

     311,000

      336,000

Transfers

   3,730,809

 

       385,806

   3,345,003

 

     284,854

   3,445,955

Total

 20,994,223

 

    2,006,658

 18,987,565

 

     996,206

 19,998,017

 

 

 

4,000 Gallon Water & Wastewater - Residential

 

Monthly Bill ($)

Total Increase

Percent Increase

Existing

                 44.57

 

 

A

                 46.47

                     1.90

4.3%

B

                 45.63

                     1.06

2.4%

C

                 46.00

                     1.43

3.2%

 

 

Attached are:

·         The details of the reductions for option B and C.

·         A comparison of existing water and wastewater rates to those of the three options.

·         A comparison of typical monthly bills of existing rates to each option.

 

The water volume charges inside city limits for option B and C differ by only $0.02 or $0.03 per 1,000 gallons. The main differences are in the monthly charge which makes the most difference to the low volume customers. Outside city limits customers see more variations in the volume charges. Sewer rates change very little.

 

Several area cities were contacted to find out what rate increases are being proposed for 2010. No 2010 rates have been adopted. The following table contains the cities that responded.

 

 

Proposed Increases for 2010

 

Water

Wastewater

Olathe

2.0%

5.0%

JoCo WW

-

7.0%

Water One

4.9%

-

Bonner Springs

5.0%

7.0%

Gardner

5.0% - 6.0%

8.0%

Lawrence

10.0%

0.0%

 

 

Utilities staff recommends Option A as it defers the least amount of maintenance to the water and wastewater systems. If a reduction must be made staff would then recommend Option C as it defers the least amount of maintenance of the remaining two options.