Memorandum
City of
City Manager’s Office
TO: |
David L. Corliss,
City Manager |
FROM: |
Jonathan Douglass,
Assistant to the City Manager |
CC: |
Brian Jimenez, Code
Enforcement Manager Cynthia Boecker,
Assistant City Manager Diane Stoddard,
Assistant City Manager |
DATE: |
February 27, 2008 |
RE: |
Review of Sidewalk
Snow and Ice Removal Ordinance |
Current City of
The City of Lawrence sidewalk
snow and ice removal ordinance requires the owner or occupant of property
adjacent to public sidewalks to “remove
from the sidewalk any snow or ice which accumulates on such sidewalk or
obstructs such sidewalk within twenty-four (24) hours after the ice forms or
the snow ceases to fall thereupon,” or to place sand on the sidewalk if the ice
cannot be removed. If the Code Enforcement Division verifies that a property is
in violation of the ordinance a written notice of violation is sent to the
property owner or occupant ordering the prompt removal of the snow or ice. If
snow is not removed within five (5) days, the current code provisions require
staff to forward a complaint to municipal court. If the person is found to be
in violation, a $20.00 fine could be imposed on property owner or occupant.
Listed below are the numbers of cases investigated under this ordinance for the past several years:
2003 |
132 cases |
2004 |
250 cases |
2005 |
125 cases |
2006 |
5 cases* |
2007 |
172 cases |
*No
significant snowfall occurred in 2006. The cases were related to snowfall
that took place in late 2005 |
Enforcement and Effectiveness Challenges of the
Current Ordinance
The issue of snow/ice removal from sidewalks presents numerous
challenges to both the citizens and staff of the City of
§
Enforcement
of this ordinance is complaint driven. Sidewalk conditions might
continue to be difficult for pedestrian travel until someone takes it upon
themselves to submit a complaint.
§
The
snow often melts before the five (5) day compliance period expires. As a result, many cases do not generate a
fine, even if the property owner does nothing to clear the sidewalk.
§
A
second snowfall can occur before the five (5) day compliance period expires. When this happens the compliance period
starts over from the latest snow/ice event.
§
Many of
the complaints the City receives are general, area-wide complaints. For
example, in one instance a caller complained that most of the sidewalks along
19th from
§
Clearing
snow and ice from sidewalks often conflicts with snow plowing on the
streets (see attached memo
on snow plowing operations). The City receives complaints from property owners
who cleared their sidewalks, only to have the sidewalk re-covered by snow when
a snow plow cleared the adjacent street. On at least one occasion a property
owner had been cited for not having a clear sidewalk and claimed that this sort
of situation had occurred. Staff handles these complaints with understanding
and professionalism, but there may not be a good solution to this challenge.
§
Staff research
indicates that the City’s $20.00 fine is very minimal compared to other
cities. The low fine may not be adequate to encourage compliance.
§
The
§
Requiring
property owners to remove snow/ice from sidewalks may be a difficult burden for
individuals who are not physically able to shovel snow/ice. To help
address this concern the City partnered with a local social service agency
several years ago to create the Safe Winter Walkways program.
The attached complaints
are a sample of comments the City receives regarding sidewalk snow removal.
Sidewalk Snow/Ice Removal in Other Communities
The sidewalk snow/ice removal
ordinance of the City of Madison, Wisconsin has been mentioned as a possible
model for the City of
Issues to Consider if Drafting New Ordinance
There are a number of policy issues to consider if it is the City Commission’s desire to have a new sidewalk snow/ice removal ordinance drafted:
ACTION: Consider changes to the sidewalk snow and ice removal ordinance. Direct staff as appropriate.