Memorandum

City of Lawrence/Douglas County

Planning and Development Services

 

TO:

Thomas M. Markus, City Manager

FROM:

Jeff Crick, Planning Manager

CC:

Scott McCullough, Director, Planning and Development Services

DATE:

October 26, 2018

RE:

Effects of Off-Campus College Students on Poverty Rates

 

The U.S. Census Bureau has recently released a study on the effects that off-campus college students can have on a community’s poverty rates. 

 

Currently, the Bureau’s poverty estimate calculation explicitly excludes people living in group quarters, which include housing such as dormitories, residential nursing home, group homes, and shelters.  However, a community’s poverty rate estimate would include college or graduate students who live in off-campus housing.  Because many college students are recorded as living in the community and often have lower incomes, they can contribute to inflating the poverty rate.

 

For Douglas County, the Census Bureau notes that 11.9% of the County’s population is off-campus students and estimates the county’s poverty rate to be 19.2%.  By removing off-campus students the poverty rate decreases by 7.2%, making the poverty rate without college students 12.0%. 

 

Similarly, Lawrence’s off-campus student population is estimated to be 14.9% of the City’s population, with a 22.3% poverty rate.  Following the removal of the college students, the poverty rate decreases 8.8%, to 13.5%.

 

Place

Poverty Universe Population

Off-Campus College Student

Poverty rates,

All People

(Est.)

Poverty rates, excluding off-campus college students

(Est.)

Differences (Est.)

Douglas Co.

107,522

11.9%

19.2%

12.0%

7.2%

Lawrence

84,591

14.9%

22.3%

13.5%

8.8%

Source: U.S. Census Bureau: 5-year (2012-2016) American Community Survey

 

The following table is a selection of comparable and regional college towns for context.


 

Places

Total number of people in poverty universe

Percent off-campus college students

Poverty rates, All People (Est.)

Poverty rates, All people excluding off-campus college students (Est.)

Differences (Est.)

Austin, TX

886,574

5.7%

16.7%

14.4%

2.3%

Lincoln, NE

259,989

6.0%

15.5%

12.5%

3.0%

Durham, NC

242,390

4.7%

18.5%

17.1%

1.4%

Lubbock, TX

233,397

8.7%

20.9%

16.4%

4.5%

Springfield, MO

154,479

7.9%

25.9%

22%

3.9%

Waco, TX

122,533

8.6%

27.5%

22.5%

5.0%

Norman, OK

110,674

11.7%

17.9%

12.7%

5.2%

Columbia, MO

108,089

16.4%

23.6%

13.1%

10.5%

Ann Arbor, MI

107,386

23.3%

23.4%

10.6%

12.8%

Boulder, CO

95,728

19.8%

22.0%

9.7%

12.3%

College Station, TX

93,474

30.8%

33.1%

15.0%

18.1%

Lawrence, KS

84,591

14.9%

22.3%

13.5%

8.8%

Fayetteville, AR

73,675

16.0%

24.9%

15.5%

9.4%

Bloomington, IN

68,625

29.1%

38.0%

21.3%

16.7%

Iowa City, IA

65,497

22.9%

28.0%

13.1%

14.9%

Ames, IA

55,100

31.6%

30.1%

8.5%

21.6%

Manhattan, KS

49,979

23.4%

24.9%

10.1%

14.8%

Chapel Hill, NC

49,263

16.3%

20.1%

9.2%

10.9%

Stillwater, OK

40,804

23.2%

34.3%

20.9%

13.4%

Morgantown, WV

24,089

28.6%

35.3%

16.9%

18.4%

Hays, KS

19,951

12.1%

17.5%

10.6%

6.9%

Pittsburg, KS

18,875

16.9%

29.4%

20.1%

9.3%

Athens, OH

16,028

46.7%

54.7%

29.3%

25.4%

 

Source: U.S. Census Bureau: 5-year (2012-2016) American Community Survey