|
PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT Regular
Agenda -Public Hearing Item |
ITEM NO. 2A PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE OREAD;
PDP-03-03-08: Revised Preliminary Development Plan for The Oread, located at
|
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Preliminary Development Plan for The
Oread based on the findings presented in the staff report and forwarding it
to the |
|
Reason for Request: |
Proposed mixed use residential and commercial development. Building
changes exceed maximum increase allowed for a Planned Unit Development and
therefore is subject to a new public hearing. |
|
|
Project
Summary:
This proposed project is a
redevelopment of multiple lots that include existing commercial buildings and
residential apartment units that will be demolished. A new multi-story
building that includes seven stories as viewed from the front on Parking for the hotel is proposed by providing four levels of below
ground parking in a garage structure for up to 200 vehicles. The addition of
below ground parking has resulted in allowing basement space to be utilized
for the hotel. The increase in
building size results from this added level and the transfer of space
previously devoted to parking to be incorporated into the hotel operations.
Another change to the project is the elimination of one of the garage
entrances to the structure from |
||
|
KEY POINT ·
Project
is proposed as a redevelopment of existing commercial and multi-family
development within the Oread Neighborhood. Total number of rooms has
increased from 104 to 109. ·
Fourth
level of below ground parking has added 13,556 SF. ·
Parking
has increased from 167 spaces to 200 spaces. ·
Oread
Neighborhood has demonstrated support of the project through multiple
neighborhood meetings. ·
Planning
Commission approved several waivers and reductions on October 22, 2007
related to the proposed development and are reflected in the notes on the
face of the development plan. ·
Revisions
have been made to the building elevations to address Commission and public
comments and additional detail has been provided on these drawings. |
||
|
FACTORS TO CONSIDER ·
Compliance
with zoning code prior to July 2006.The general standards are found in
Section 20-1006 and Section 20-1010. ·
Overall
building changes require a new public hearing because of the overall increase
in total square footage. ·
Previous
actions related to the waivers are not affected. |
||
|
ASSOCIATED CASES/OTHER ACTION
REQUIRED ·
Z-07-13-07;
CN1 and RM32 to PCD-2 to be published with recording of plat. ·
DR-07-93-07;
HRC considered the project on August 16 and September 20, 2007; CC appeal
considered on 2/7/08. ·
Revision
to PDP-07-03-07 approved by the City Commission on February 7, 2008. [All
conditions of original approval are shown on revised plan.] ·
City
Commission approval of the revised Preliminary Development Plan. ·
FDP-03-04-08;
Final Development Plan Concurrent consideration by Planning Commission
subject to City Commission approval of the PDP. ·
Minor
Subdivision (dedication of easements for access and utility) ·
Public
improvement plans for off-site improvements for sanitary sewer and storm sewer
are required. ·
Street
improvement plans to be submitted at a later date. ·
Redevelopment
Plan and Development Agreement approved and executed by the City Commission
as related to the Tax Increment Financing District. |
||
|
PUBLIC COMMENT RECEIVED PRIOR
TO PRINTING No new comments have been received by staff regarding this revised Preliminary
Development Plan. |
||
|
General information |
|
|
Current
Zoning and Land Use: |
CN1 (Inner Neighborhood
Commercial) & RM32 (Multi-Dwelling Residential); existing commercial
establishments and apartment dwellings |
|
|
Surrounding Zoning: |
The subject property is
comprised of several properties. The immediate area is surrounding by RM32
(Multi-Dwelling Residential) in all directions. Uses include apartments,
single-family homes as well as a church and university property to the west
and south. Subject property located within
proximity to Hancock Historic district, National Register of Historic Places,
Oread Historic district, Register of Historic Kansas Places, and the Jane A.
Snow Residence, National Register of Historic Places and the Lawrence
Register of Historic Places. |
|
Site Summary: The Oread a
single building single phase development |
|
|
Number of Lots: |
1144 Indiana [former Yellow Sub] .162 acres 618 W. 12 Street [Crossing] .204 acres 1142 1140 Proposed to be re-platted as a single lot. |
|
Gross Area: |
.746 acres |
|
Rights-of-way: |
No new right-of-way proposed |
|
Easements: |
20’ access and utility easement dedicated and shown on plat of
property located on north side of building. |
|
Building Size: |
99,688 GSF parking levels P4
to P1. 135,050 GSF building space
including all private terrace areas (and excluding public terrace areas) 11,719 GSF public terrace
areas (included in open space calculations) |
|
Number dwelling units: |
Proposed 10 condo units on floors 6 and 7. [7 – 1 or 2 bedroom units
and 3 – 3 bedroom units.] Total 26 units possible at maximum density of 35
units per acre. Rooms included in total 109 count for entire building. |
|
Hotel Space: |
99 rooms and ancillary uses |
|
Retail Space: |
24,695 GSF [19,352 NSF] includes restaurant/bar space |
|
Restaurant Space: |
6,680 GSF [5,344 NSF] |
|
Open Space Required: |
20% per 20-1008 (B) pre 7/1/06 development code 6,499 SF |
|
Open Space Provided: |
12,707 GSF (excludes private terrace areas) |
|
Off-Street Parking
Required: |
320 spaces at 1/200 for non-residential uses and 1.5 spaces per unit
for residential units. |
|
Off-Street Parking
Provided: |
200 spaces provided reduction granted to allow no less than 165
spaces per PDP-06-03-07 by Planning Commission on 10/22/07. |
STAFF ANALYSIS
The property is generally located on the north side of
1)
In
what respects the plan is or is not in general conformity with the provisions
of the Comprehensive Plan of the City.
Staff Finding – The plan generally supports infill and redevelopment
of properties within existing neighborhoods.
2)
In
what respects the plan is or is not consistent with the Statement of Objectives
of Planned Unit Development. [The statement of objectives of planned unit
developments is found in Section 20-1002 of the Zoning Ordinance]
Staff Finding – The PCD zoning provides
the maximum flexibility to the developer in tailoring the uses and the project
to community desires. Waivers previously approved have not been altered by the
addition of another level of below ground parking and the increase in interior
space. The objectives of the development
to provide a mixed use infill development have not been changed by this revised
Preliminary Development Plan.
3)
The
nature and extent of the common open space in the Planned Unit Development, the
reliability of the proposals for maintenance and conservation of the common
open space, and the adequacy or inadequacy of the amount and function of the
common open space in terms of the densities and dwelling types proposed in the plan.
Staff Finding – A total 6,499 SF is required to meet the
minimum 20% standard set out in section 20-1008 (B). The open terrace areas
represent 11,719 SF of the building. This area exceeds the minimum requirement
independently. The combination of the ground level open spaces and the proposed
terrace areas within the building exceed the minimum requirements of the PCD. The
plan notes that the terrace areas shall not be converted to enclosed space unless
a revised plan is approved. The plan also adds an additional restriction that
in no case shall the open space area be reduced below 9,780 SF which is 1.5
times the requirement.
4)
Whether
the plan does or does not make adequate provisions for public services, provide
adequate control over vehicular traffic, and further the amenities of light and
air, recreation and visual enjoyment.
Staff Finding – No changes are required to the street
configuration based on the Traffic Study recommendations. Pedestrian pathways
are shown on the development plan consistent with previous staff comments. With
regard to
5)
Whether
the plan will or will not have a substantial adverse effect on adjacent
property and the development or conservation of the neighborhood area.
Staff Finding –The proposed changes to the project result
from the addition of the below grade parking level, the removal of the second
garage access and the reconfiguration of space within the building. The uses
and building size from the exterior are not significantly altered. The Historic Resources Commission determined
there was adverse effect to the neighborhood. However, the City Commission ruled
on February 7, 2008 that adverse impact had been mitigated. Minor alterations
to all four elevations including materials, fenestration patterns and the
garage entrances have been made to the project.
6) In what respects the plan is or is not in
conformance with the development standards and criteria of this article.
Specific waivers are associated with this proposed development
including minimum area for a PCD, access to a collector street, reduction in
minimum area, building setback reductions, and off-street parking reductions.
Waivers and reductions were approved by the Planning Commission October 22,
2007. No changes in the area, setback or other associated elements are altered
by this revised Preliminary Development Plan. A summary of the waivers can be found
in the October 22, 2007 staff report for PDP-07-03-07.
Staff Finding – This Preliminary Development
Plan is in conformance with the provisions of a Planned Unit Development.
7)
In
what respects the plan is or is not in compliance with the requirements for
application for tentative approval of the Planned Unit Development. [This
finding refers to Section 20-1005 of the Zoning Ordinance.]
Staff Finding – The development request is related to a
rezoning action that has been approved and is pending publication [Z-07-13-07].
8)
The
sufficiency of the terms and conditions proposed to protect the interest of the
public and the residents of the Planned Unit Development in the case of a plan
that proposes development over a period of years.
Staff Finding – It is expected that the development will
take a period of time to construct and includes considerable excavation. The
applicant is working with City staff to identify necessary coordination and
staging activities related to construction.
However, the project is not a “phased” development that includes
multiple buildings over a large area.
9)
Stormwater
detention calculations and storage of excess stormwater drainage as per City
Policy.
Staff Finding – Stormwater drainage documentation was
submitted to staff for review. The applicant is working on finalizing the public
improvement plans for review. There is no on-site detention associated with the
proposed development.