Memorandum
City of
Public Works
TO: |
David L. Corliss |
FROM: |
Chuck Soules |
CC: |
|
Date: |
April 23, 2008 |
RE: |
City Project No. 18-CP7-507(S) Expand Scope of Project Approve Response to County Approve Placement of Appointments to
Steering Committee April 29, 2008 Regular
Agenda Item |
Please include the following item
on the City Commission regular agenda for consideration at the April 29, 2008
meeting:
Project Details/Details. In 2006 the City was informed of an $800,000 earmark for the
construction of
·
6/15/06
– City submitted a Request for Construction Project to initiate the project |
·
4/24/07
– City Commission approved consultant selection process |
·
8/23/07
– City Commission approves consultant selection of Wilson & Company, Inc. |
·
11/1/07
– Study session with City Commission; Wilson & Co. 8/30/07 improvements
memo |
·
2/12/08
– Approved Scope of Services with Wilson & Co. |
Tentative Future Timeline.
·
2/12/08
- City Commission consideration of scope of work |
·
5/08
– Create Steering Committee First Committee meeting – discuss
project, Wilson & Co. role, Committee role, receive input |
·
6/08
– Second Committee Meeting – Wilson & Co. work plan options, input and
feedback. |
·
7/08
– Public Meeting – present options, discuss issues, receive input, comments,
feedback |
·
8/08
– Take input to Steering Committee to address |
·
Fall
2008 – 2nd Public Meeting |
·
Late
Fall 2008 – Presentation of study to
City Commission; six months to right-of-way plans |
·
Summer
2009 – securing right-of-way corridor |
Background. On March 24, 2008 the Board of County
Commissioners (BOCC) was briefed on the status of the
During the March 24th discussion, the BOCC
expressed their feeling that further study of
Like the study underway for the
Haskell-to-O’Connell segment, an expanded study to include areas east of
O’Connell to Route 1057 would consider and determine:
·
Projected
traffic counts and traffic classifications
·
Design
parameters including design speed
·
Recommended
typical section
·
Recommended
horizontal and vertical (profile) alignment
·
Right-of-way
requirements for the recommended alignment
·
Estimated
cost of improvements
An expanded study to include areas
east of O’Connell would also allow for more informed discussion between the
City Commission (CC) and BOCC to determine:
·
Phasing
of improvements
·
Timing
of phased improvements
·
Prospective
funding of improvements
·
City/County
collaboration on improvements
Attached is a request from the
Staff agrees that the corridor
along
Attached for the Commission’s
consideration is a response/proposal to the county for our contribution to the
expansion of the scope of services for
Action Requested:
·
Pending
Commission discussion, approve response to
·
Pending
Respectfully
submitted,
Charles F. Soules,
P.E.
Director of Public
Works
Attachments: County
4/7/08 Letter