ITEM NO. 4: L-09-02-07
STAFF REPORT
A. SUMMARY
L-09-02-07: Hold public hearing for
consideration of placing the structure located at
B. HISTORIC REGISTER STATUS
C. REVIEW CONSIDERATIONS
1) History Summary
According to the National Register nomination,
the Double Hyperbolic Paraboloid House is eligible for listing for its
distinctive and experimental construction. It is a rare example of a particular
building method for a single-family residence with the use of a wooden
hyperbolic roof structure.
Constructed in 1956, the structure
was designed by Dr. Donald Dean and constructed with the aid of his senior
students from the
See attached National Register nomination
for supporting history.
2) Architectural Integrity
Summary
The structure maintains a high
degree of integrity. The interior has
been altered, but the character-defining features have been maintained.
See attached National Register
nomination.
3) Context Description
The Double Hyperbolic Paraboloid
House is an excellent example of a unique housing type that was constructed in
See attached National Register
nomination for additional context description
4)
Double Hyperbolic Paraboloid House is
zoned RS7, Single-Dwelling Residential District. The primary purpose of the RS district is to
accommodate predominantly single detached dwelling units on individual
lots. The RS district is intended to
create, maintain, and promote housing opportunities for individual households,
although nonresidential uses that are compatible with residential neighborhoods
are permitted.
5) Fiscal Comments
There are no monetary benefits
directly associated with nomination of a structure to the Lawrence Register of
Historic Places at this time. However,
Chapter 22 of the Code of the City of
Listing on the local register does
help preserve built resources important to
The original information submitted
with nominations for properties to the Lawrence Register is kept on file in the
City
This property is listed on the
National Register of Historic Places and is eligible for State Rehabilitation
Tax Credits and other funding sources tied to National Register listing.
6) Positive/Negative Effects
of the Designation
The positive effect of designation
is the creation of a permanent record of the historical significance of an
individual property, for its architectural quality or its association with a
significant local individual or event. This
provides the local Historic Resources Commission, an advisory board, with
pertinent historical data which can help to provide an ‘historic' perspective
to property owners when they desire to improve, add on, or redevelop a property
within an older section of the City.
The public accessibility of this
information is also a resource as it can be used by realtors,
builders/developers, and others in the community prior to a property's resale,
redevelopment or rehabilitation. In a
more general sense, this information can be used by the Chamber of Commerce and
existing businesses and industries to ‘identify' one of the facets that makes
up Lawrence's Quality of Living.
Additional effects of designation
are the creation of an arbitrary, 250' environs notification and review area.
Within this 250' circle, projects which require city permits, e.g., demolition,
redevelopment, renovation or modification, require review by Historic Resources
staff or the Commission. These environs
reviews permit scrutiny of proposed development/redevelopment by individuals
sensitive to historic preservation.
A Certificate of Appropriateness or a Certificate of Economic Hardship is required to be issued by the
Historic Resources Commission before a City permit can be issued for the
proposed project. If the Historic
Resources Commission denies a Certificate
of Appropriateness or a Certificate
of Economic Hardship, the property owner can appeal to the City Commission
for a new hearing. The City Commission
can uphold the decision of the
The local ordinance 250' environs
review area is exceeded by State law with regard to State and/or National
Register properties. Certificates of
Appropriateness or Economic Hardship are required for a project within the 250'
radius of a Local Register property.
Examples of projects which would
require review and approval are: projects involving the exterior
building which are considered ‘structural' changes, demolitions or partial
demolitions, rezonings, replats, site plans, variance requests or other items
which require a city permit or are the direct result of an action of the City
Commission. Minor changes which require
a city permit can be administratively approved by the Historic Resources
Administrator.
7) Summary of Applicable
Designation Criteria
Chapter 22, of the City Code is the
Conservation of Historic Resources Code
for the City of
D. CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION AND
DESIGNATION - Section 22-403
Nine criteria are provided within
this section for review and determination of qualification as a Landmark or
Historic District. These criteria are
set forth below with staff's recommendations as to which this application
qualifies for:
(1) Its character, interest, or
value as part of the development, heritage or cultural characteristics of the community,
county, state, or nation;
(2) Its location as a site of a
significant local, county, state, or national event;
(3) Its identification with a
person or persons who significantly contributed to the development of the
community, county, state, or nation;
(4) Its embodiment of distinguishing
characteristics of an architectural style valuable for the study of a period,
type, method of construction, or use of indigenous materials;
The structure at
(5) Its identification as a work
of a master builder, designer, architect, or landscape architect whose
individual work has influenced the development of the community, county, state
or nation;
(6) Its embodiment of elements of design, detailing, materials, or
craftsmanship that render it architecturally significant;
As a unique example of modern
architecture,
(7) Its embodiment of design
elements that make it structurally or architecturally innovative;
(8) Its unique location or
singular physical characteristics that make it an established or familiar
visual feature;
(9) Its character as a
particularly fine or unique example of a utilitarian structure; including, but
not limited to farmhouses, gas stations, or other commercial structures, with a
high level of integrity or architectural significance.
-------------------------
The HISTORIC RESOURCES CODE
establishes a procedure to follow in the forwarding of a recommendation to the
City Commission on applications for listing on the local register.
"Following the hearing the commission shall adopt by resolution a
recommendation to be submitted to the city commission for either (a)
designation as a landmark or historic district; (b) not to designate as a
landmark or historic district; or, (c) not to make a recommendation. The resolution shall be accompanied by a
report to the city commission containing the following information:
The Historic Resources Commission
needs to formulate its recommendation in response to the following subsections
section 22-404.2 (b):
(1) Explanation of the
significance or lack of significance of the nominated landmark or historic
district as it relates to the criteria for designation as set forth in section
22-403;
(2) Explanation of the
integrity or lack of integrity of the nominated landmark or historic district;
(3) In the case of a
nominated landmark found to meet the criteria for designation:
(A) The significant exterior
architectural features of the nominated landmark that should be protected; and,
(B) The types of
construction, alteration, demolition, and removal, other than those requiring a
building or demolition permit, that cannot be undertaken without obtaining a
certificate of appropriateness.
(4) In the case of a
nominated historic district found to meet the criteria for designation:
(A) The types of significant
exterior architectural features of the structures within the nominated historic
district that should be protected;
(B) The types of
construction, alteration, demolition, and removal, other than those requiring a
building or demolition permit, that cannot be undertaken without obtaining a
certificate of appropriateness.
(C) A list of all key
contributing, contributing and noncontributing sites, structures and objects
within the historic district.
(5) Proposed design guidelines
for applying the criteria for review of certificates of appropriateness to the
nominated landmark or historic district.
(6) The relationship of the
nominated landmark or historic district to the on-going effort of the
commission to identify and nominate all potential areas and structures that
meet the criteria for designation.
(7) A map showing the
location of the nominated landmark or the boundaries of the nominated historic
district.
E. RECOMMENDATION:
The Double Hyperbolic Paraboloid
located at
If the Historic Resources
Commission recommends this property for local nomination, the Commission should
adopt a resolution for recommendation to be submitted to the City Commission
for designation as a landmark. Staff shall
prepare a report including the information set forth in Section 22-404.2(1) - (7)
and an environs definition to be forwarded to the City Commission with the
adopted resolution.