PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT

NON-PUBLIC HEARING ITEM

 

PC Staff Report

03/26/08

ITEM NO. 13            ANNEXATION OF 154.9 ACRES; NW CORNER N 1800 RD & E 900 RD (SLD)

 

A-02-02-08: Annexation of approximately 154.9 acres, located at the NW corner of N 1800 Road & E 900 Road. Submitted by Steven Schwada, agent for Stonewall Farms LLC; JDS Kansas LC; Pert LC; Penny J Tuckel; Axrom LLC; Venture Realty Corporation; Arco Sales Corporation; Venture Properties Inc; Industrial Square Corp; JDSS Limited Company; Radol LC; Tuckel Russell L JR; Northland Ventures LC; and Oread LC, property owners of record. Referred by City Commission on 2-12-08.

 

STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend that the City Commission defer consideration of the proposed annexation until a sector plan can be completed for the area that includes the subject property. 

 

Additional recommendation:

Staff recommends that the Planning Commission initiate a sector plan and Comprehensive Plan amendment to study the subject and surrounding area.

 

 

Applicant’s Reason for Request:

“Future industrial/warehouse development.”

 

KEY POINTS

·        This is a request to annex approximately 155 acres to allow for industrial development.

·        The subject property is not located within the Urban Growth Area.

·        This request is not accompanied by a rezoning or other development request or subdivision plat.

·        The Planning Commission considered and acted on a rezoning request for the same property 12-17-07.

·        A protest petition was filed in opposition to the proposed county industrial rezoning application.

 

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FACTORS TO CONSIDER

http://www.lawrenceplanning.org

·         Chapter 4 (Growth Management);

·         Chapter 7 (Industrial and Employment-Related Land Use) existing and proposed; and,

·         Chapter 8 (Transportation) of Horizon 2020.

 

ASSOCIATED CASES/OTHER ACTION REQUIRED

 

o        Comprehensive Plan Chapter 7 update approved and published (CPA-2004-02 scheduled for March 26 PC meeting)

o        Sector plan approved and adopted (I-70/Farmer’s Turnpike Sector Plan in process)

o        Site Specific development actions:

1.      Annexation

·         Approval of annexation by County Commission.

·         City Commission and ordinance publication is required.

·         Annexation of public right-of-way for perimeter streets/roads

2.      Platting

·         Submission and approval of subdivision plat for property as a pre-development requirement.

·         Acceptance of dedication of rights-of-way and easements by City Commission.

·         Approval of Public Improvement Plans by the City Public Works Department and Utilities Department is required prior to recordation of the final plat.

·         Written certification from the City Engineer that all required public improvements have been completed or submittal of a means of ensuring completion of required public improvements listed in Section 20-811(h)(2) of Article 8 of the Land Development Code is required prior to recordation of the final plat.

3.      Rezoning

·         Submission, approval, and publication of an ordinance as a pre-development requirement.

4.      Site Planning

·         Submittal and administrative approval of applicable site plans/development plans prior to obtaining building permits.

 

This may not be an entirely inclusive list. Studies related to other topics such as transportation, retail market studies and utility impact studies may also be required dependent upon land use recommendations and requests.

 

PUBLIC COMMENT RECEIVED PRIOR TO PRINTING

·         David Ross; area resident inquiring about request and relationship to pending rezoning application

 

 

EXISTING CONDITIONS

Current Zoning and Land Use:       A (Agricultural) District; undeveloped agricultural property used as pasture land.

 

Surrounding Zoning and Land Use:    A (Agricultural) District; existing fields and crop land including rural residential homes located along existing County roads.

Other uses noted in previous public hearing.

·         Agriculturally zoned land use including: pasture, vacant wooded land, legal non-conforming industrial use[1], residential, commercial,

·         Rural Water tower to the southwest located on 1 acre tract

·         Communication tower located southwest of subject property near water tower

·         Proximity to intersection of major arterial roads and I-70 interchange.

 

STAFF REVIEW

 

Annexation Procedure:

Kansas Law [12-519 et seq.] provides for annexation by ordinance of the City Commission. Lawrence City policy requires the Lawrence-Douglas County Metropolitan Planning Commission to review and make recommendations on all annexation requests in excess of ten acres. Upon annexation, the property is required to be rezoned to a compatible City zoning district. The proposed request is not accompanied by a rezoning request.

 

The City of Lawrence Administrative Annexation Policy (AP-74) requires that the costs associated with compensation to a Rural Water District be paid to the City by the annexation applicant for Rural Water District facilities serving the property to be annexed. The subject property is served by Rural Water District #6. As a condition of annexation publication, the City of Lawrence, via fees collected from the developer, will need to compensate the Rural Water District for Rural Water District facilities within the annexed area prior to publication of the annexation ordinance.

 

General Location and Site Characteristics:

The site requested for annexation is located on the north side of N 1800 Road (Farmer’s Turnpike) and the west side of E 900 Road. The subject property does not adjoin existing city limit boundaries along any property line. The subject property is approximately 1.6 miles north of the city limits along K-10 and about two miles west of the current city limits along Farmer’s Turnpike. The subject property is outside of and adjacent to the north boundary of the existing Urban Growth Boundary.

 

The site currently includes agricultural uses. The project area is currently zoned County A (Agricultural) District. The same zoning surrounds the subject property in all immediate directions. No portions of the property are encumbered by Special Flood Hazard Areas.

 

The subject property is bounded on three sides by existing County right-of-way on the north, east and south sides. The subject property is located within direct proximity to the I-70 highway interchange.

 

Infrastructure and Utility Extension:

The subject property is currently located in the unincorporated area of Douglas County. Development of the property will require the extension of municipal City services or development of an interim service plan. One standard condition of annexation approval is that the applicant is responsible for providing the City with compensation for Rural Water District facilities located on the property. The property is currently served by a Rural Water District.

 

Upon annexation necessary utility services would need to be extended or a plan developed to phase the extension over a period of time. Any utility extension must be consistent with master plans for these specific facilities. In some cases master plans would need to be first updated. Service areas are established to set the timing and provision of utility extensions and the development of various areas within the defined the Urban Growth Area.  The subject property is not located within any identified Service Area within the existing UGA or beyond that boundary.

 

Sanitary Sewer

Extension of sanitary sewer services to new urban development requires a Utility Department review of a Downstream Sanitary Sewer Analysis and a Preliminary Plat. At this time no specific development proposal has been submitted. Current urban services are over two miles from the subject property. There are no existing planning documents that detail this area with regard to future sanitary sewer services. The City’s currently adopted wastewater master plan does not address this area. Staff is currently in the process of requesting proposals for a new wastewater system master plan. The planning boundaries of this effort have not been defined at this time; but will be coordinated with Planning and other City Departments.  A specific study of the watershed will be required to assess impacts on the current system and evaluate designated capital projects that may be affected by the proposed development. Significant information is needed to evaluate the proposed request including determination of land uses. Improvements in this area are not planned within the scope of Horizon 2020.

 

Extensions of sanitary sewer mains are required for urban development. Approval of sanitary sewer public improvement plans are typically a requirement of the subdivision process.

 

Water

Extensions of water mains and adequate fire flow are required for urban development. Existing Urban services are over 2 miles from the subject property. The applicant has proposed providing on-site tower facilities to aid in fire protection. Rural water service (at a residential standard) is available to the site currently. The Rural Water District has expressed concerns about adequate service if the property is developed as a County non-residential development project. Annexation of the subject property typically requires extension of municipal water to the site. There are no active plans to extend water service to this property. Approval of waterline public improvement plans is required as part of the subdivision process. The current City’s municipal water master plan does not address the extension of service to this area.

 

Stormwater

The subject property includes several natural drainage paths that connect to larger drainage sheds, feed agricultural ponds and provide watering sources for livestock. Regional detention is recommended for each separate water shed that encompass the subject property. No such plan has been developed. Approval of stormwater public improvement plans for off-site improvements is required prior to filing of the Final Plat. Provision of adequate detention is required for urban development.

 

Private Utilities

Electric, phone, and gas, extensions would have to be made to this property. There are no active development plans at this time. Utility providers have been notified of the proposed request. To date, only Westar has indicated, in a development meeting with staff, that current service would need to be substantially upgraded to provide service to the subject property for non-residential uses.

 

Other Services

The subject property is outside of existing or proposed service response districts. Annexation of the subject property will require execution of a service delivery plan for emergency services to this property.

 

School facilities

The subject property is located outside of the Lawrence (USD 497) school district boundary. Perry-Lecompton school district (USD 343) is the service provider in this area.  The school district has been made aware of the request and indicated that Farmer’s Turnpike is a bus route so that traffic volume increases could be a concern in the future. Annexation of the subject property will not alter the existing school district boundaries with regard to service provider. Such a change in district boundaries would require discussion and approval at the local and state level.

 

Public Rights-of-Way

The subject property is located within the vicinity of the I-70/K-10 interchange. The property is separated from the interchange access by N 1800 Road/Farmer’s Turnpike. This segment of N 1800 Road that bounds the south property line includes two types of arterial street designations currently. Minor arterial is designated to the east and principal arterial is designated to the west. Two existing roads, E 900 Road (along the east property line) and N 1850 Road (along the north property line), are currently local rural roads.

 

Development of the area would include an assessment of roadway improvements abutting the property. Necessary improvements would require the road to be fully within the City limits. Boundary line roads where one-half is located in the city and the other half is located in the county have resulted in difficult maintenance situations over time. Examples of boundary line roads include 31st Street, O’Connell Road, and Franklin Road. Annexation should include the full width of the adjacent roadway for future planning purposes.

 

Dual naming of such roads may be necessary to maintain both county and city names for addressing purposes for those properties outside of the annexation boundary. 

 

Internal circulation and access to abutting roads will need to be assessed with a specific development proposal. A traffic impact study will be required to evaluate proposed access options, separation requirements, geometric improvements and similar items both internally and as development relates to the surrounding road network.

 

No direct access is permitted to arterials, per the Land Development Code, unless the City Engineer grants a waiver from this requirement. A specific development plan has not been submitted to assess a full scope of transportation issues for this property. Street intersection spacing will be critical as the area develops and should be designed initially for best efficiency.

 

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:

Horizon 2020 – Chapter 4 Growth Management

Per Map 3-1 in Chapter 3 of Horizon 2020, General Plan Overview, and the policies outlined in Chapter 4, Growth Management, the subject property is located beyond the Urban Growth Area. The property is not identified on the Future Land Use Map in Horizon 2020. Rural areas are defined as that land that lies outside of the designated Urban Growth Area of the incorporated cities. Lands in the RA are not planned to develop or to support urban densities of development during the planning period (page 4-4).

 

Growth management policies address the need to evaluate the proposed development with respect to the provision of services, protection of topographic and drainage concerns, and applicable land use criteria. Horizon 2020 gives priority to properties that abut existing city limits. It also supports the approach that adequate facilities and services are provided or assured in connection with development (page 4-1).

 

Finding: The annexation request is not consistent with the growth management policies found in Horizon 2020.

 

General policies related to growth management address the need to evaluate the proposed development with respect to the provision of services, protection of topographic and drainage concerns and with respect to land use criteria. Additional detail is needed to assess these elements including a sanitary sewer impact analysis, service delivery plan for water and other utility extensions and public services such as fire protection. Additional information is needed regarding the extension of the street network to serve the subject property and the surrounding area. In staff’s opinion, an appropriate first step would be execution of a specific area (sector) plan prior to consideration of specific development proposals.

 

Horizon 2020 allows for the initiation of development within Service Areas 2, 3, and 4 prior to the full build-out of Service Area 1 when wastewater capacity is clearly available; a plan for interim development for the provision of rights-of-way and easements is complete; and when comparable build-out of Service Area 1 has been addressed. The Plan clearly gives priority to properties that abut existing city limits. The Plan also gives priority to developments that are consistent with adopted utility plans.  The subject property is not located in a Service Area at this time.

 

Horizon 2020 – Chapter 7 Industrial and Employment-Related Land Use

Existing: The existing Chapter 7 of Horizon 2020 does not include the general area of the subject property as a future industrial site. The plan supports the development and increase in the number and diversity of jobs for the entire community (Douglas County as a whole) and as such is a key strategy of the existing chapter. The chapter, as currently adopted, does not support industrial use in this location.

 

Draft: The revised Chapter 7 is scheduled for consideration by the Planning Commission on March 26, 2008 (Item No. 12) and brings together the importance of the natural environment and a diversified economy as a tool for development considerations. A key feature of the draft plan is to: encourage site improvements, and community amenities which best respond to the market demands for industrial and business development while maintaining the community objectives for the type and quality of such development. The chapter also defines various types of industrial uses. A specific development application has not been submitted, but preliminary discussions of a warehouse and distribution use have been presented to city staff and others.  While the subject property may meet the above identified goal, additional planning is needed to assure that the community objectives are addressed.

 

This discussion is not intended to analyze the specific zoning district that would support a warehouse and distribution use. The draft Chapter 7 provides location criteria for new industrial areas and includes 150 acres identified as Farmer’s Turnpike. The plan specifically states:

 

 

·                     Farmer’s Turnpike

 

            Transportation: Federal Interstate and State Highway access

            Parcel Size: 150 acres, with possibility of more

            Floodplain: None

            Slope: Mainly 0-3%

            Prime Farmland: Approximately 40% covered.

 

The Farmer’s Turnpike area lies generally north of N 1800 Road (Farmer’s Turnpike) near the intersection of Kansas Highway 10 and I-70. The proposed area contains roughly 150 acres with the potential for more land to be identified for industrial and employment related land use through the long-range planning process. That process includes completion of a sector plan prior to annexation and development to better understand appropriate land uses, infrastructure issues and other service issues, such as police and fire protection. The area contains land of minimal slope (0-3%) and also lies outside of the 100-year floodplain. Approximately 40% of the 150 acre site is covered with prime farmland. This area substantially meets the general locational criteria and will be an important future economic development area for the Lawrence community because of its prime location near the I-70 interchange. The site is adjacent to, but outside of the Urban Growth Area, and is some distance from the Lawrence City limits making providing urban infrastructure a challenge.  Pending approval of a sector plan, an interim step may be to allow the site to have limited development of warehouse and distribution activities utilizing rural infrastructure until such time that urban services are available. In the future, this area will be an important gateway to the city that has the opportunity to develop as a work-live campus type center or Industrial/Business/Research Park [emphasis added].

         

 

Finding: The draft revised Chapter 7 supports the subject property as a future industrial development when appropriate and applicable planning for the area has been completed. Staff has begun working on the I-70/Farmer’s Turnpike Sector Plan and anticipates a completion date near the end of summer 2008.

 

Horizon 2020 – Chapter 8 Transportation

The transportation chapter provides the goals and policies related to development and recognize the relationship of transportation and land use planning. The plan also acknowledges the importance of pedestrian and bicycle access as modes of transportation. Multi-modal transportation (rail and air) as well as ground transportation are elements of consideration for development. The existing transportation maps designate N 1800 Road/Farmer’s Turnpike as an arterial street. A principal designation is specified for that area generally west of the subject property and a minor arterial designation exists for the road segment east of the I-70 interchange. It should be noted that the updated transportation maps proposed with T2030 reclassify the road to a principal arterial along between the subject property’s west boundaries to the N. Iowa Street intersection.

 

Several goals and policies are provided in Horizon 2020 related to transportation concerns found in Chapter 8, Transportation. Goals addressing multi-use trails, sidewalks, and alternative modes of transportation can be implemented with specific development proposals and coordinated between individual properties throughout the subject property and surrounding area. The requirements for traffic impact studies at the property level and the larger planning area are needed to identify necessary capital improvements to serve the surrounding area as it develops. Assessment of land use will both predict and prescribe appropriate types of access needs. As such detailed area plans are needed to facilitate the implementation of transportation goals and policies listed in Horizon 2020. Refer to Chapter 8 Horizon 2020 for a full list of the goals and policies.

 

Development Code

An evaluation of the Development Code is not included in this report because there are no associated development requests such as rezoning or site plan applications that would address land use.

 

Area Plan

The subject property is located in an area identified for long range planning referred to as the I-70/ Farmer’s Turnpike Plan. There are no existing area or neighborhood plans that have been developed for this area.  An area plan is recommended prior to annexation of the subject property.

 

DISCUSSION OF LAND USE AND REQUEST:

Horizon 2020 supports a definitive approach that utility services and major street improvements should be in place prior to development. Significant municipal utilities must be extended to serve this area to support urban development. 

 

Growth management is defined in Horizon 2020 as the primary tool for ensuring timely and orderly growth. This tool includes establishment of an Urban Growth Area, service delivery areas and specific annexation policies.

 

Annexation Policy number 1 states that the “City of Lawrence will actively seek voluntary annexation of land within the Urban Growth Area as development is proposed”.  This annexation request is an initial development proposal in the area. The subject property is not immediately contiguous to existing city limits. Contiguity, as recommended per Annexation Policy number 2, is not provided for in this application.   The Comprehensive Plan supports a proactive annexation plan that ensures adequate facilities and services. The Plan specifically recommends annexation of “areas which are needed to complete sewer or water line extensions for a closed (looped) system” per Growth Management Goal 3, Policy 3.2.a.  The proposed request is inconsistent with the recommendations for annexation.

 

The subject property is located beyond the City of Lawrence Urban Growth Area. Horizon 2020 supports the provision of adequate facilities and services or assurances of adequate facilities in connection with development. Public and private utilities must be extended and/or upgraded to serve this area. Sanitary sewer, water, off-site stormwater, and roadway improvements need to be identified and planned for extension and improvement for both the short term and long term delivery.

 

This report highlights several adopted policies that would preclude annexation of the subject property at this time.  It is important to note that other policies, mostly contained in the proposed Chapter 7 (Industrial and Employment-Related Land Use), are revised and support the subject site as a key industrial site in the city’s future.  Staff recognizes that while it will take time and effort to provide utility and other infrastructure to the general area, there is opportunity to plan for and permit some amount of development in the area so that any development in the area meets the City’s code requirements, thus ensuring that when the area does develop to urban densities, it more seamlessly fits into the urban pattern.  The I-70 interchange and surrounding area will be an important economic generator for the region and planning today for its eventual build out is appropriate and valuable.

 

This request attempts to meet a recognized need for large-parcel industrial land along I-70.  Staff concurs with the applicant that this is an important area for future development, but also believes that proper land use, utility, and facilities planning should be accomplished prior to considering a specific development request.  Planning staff has completed preliminary work on the I-70/Farmer’s Turnpike Sector plan and the Utilities Department is poised to analyze sewer service in the area.

 

CONCLUSION

The proposed application lacks a detailed service delivery plan that assesses the timing and provision of major infrastructure and how this infrastructure may be extended to other surrounding properties in the future. The proposed request is premature due to the lack of comprehensive planning in and for the area. Additional study of the area should be considered prior to proceeding with the proposed annexation.

 

Development of a sector plan to address land uses, infrastructure, transportation and other development opportunities is recommended. The subject property and remaining surrounding area are outside of the current urban fire protection response area. Additional planning will also be required for public facilities to implement improvements to serve the area upon annexation.

 

The development of the subject property includes a consideration of adequate timing of providing the necessary infrastructure for basic utilities such as water and wastewater. Development of an interim plan for services such as continued use of rural water and on-site wastewater disposal would be required to serve development in the short term. Such a plan should be tied directly to specific uses for development to mitigate harm to the surrounding area and to assure that adequate provisions are provided for integrating the development into the ultimate system when appropriate.

 

Staff believes that a sector plan can be completed by the end of the summer 2008 and that additional information related to providing utilities may also be available at that time.  Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend deferral of the consideration for annexation for the subject property until a sector plan can be completed for the area.

 



[1] Foley Construction identified as a Legal Non-Conforming Land use by Douglas County Staff 12/2003. Not required to register as a home occupation or to rezone property.