LAWRENCE HISTORIC RESOURCES COMMISSION

ITEM NO. 3: DR-03-33-06

STAFF REPORT

 

A.                 SUMMARY

 

DR-03-33-06:       200 W. 9th Street; Addition; Certified Local Government Review. Submitted

by the City of Lawrence, property owner of record. The property is listed on the National Register of

Historic Places. The property is also located in the Downtown Conservation Overlay District.

 

           

B.         PROJECT DESCRIPTION

 

The applicant is requesting to construct an addition to the north elevation of the structure located at 200 W. 9th Street.

 

 

South Elevation 200 W. 9Th Street – Carnegie Library

 

C.         Standard for Review

 

Certified Local Government Review

 

For projects that require a Certified Local Government Review the Historic Resources Commission has typically used the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards to evaluate the proposed project. 

 

 

Standards for Evaluating the Effect of Projects on Historic Buildings

 

The following standards apply to the proposed alterations:

 

1.  A property shall be used for its historic purpose or be placed in a new use that requires minimal change to the defining characteristics of the building and its site and environment.

 

2.  The historic character of a property shall be retained and preserved.  The removal of historic material or alteration of features and spaces that characterize a property shall be avoided.

 

3.       Each property shall be recognized as a physical record of its time, place, and use.  Changes that create a false sense of historical development, such as adding conjectural features or architectural elements from other buildings, shall no be undertaken.

 

4.  Most properties change over time; those changes that have acquired historical significance in their own right shall be retained and preserved.

 

5.  Distinctive features, finishes, and construction techniques or examples of craftsmanship that characterize a historic property shall be preserved. 

 

6.  Deteriorated historic features shall be repaired rather than replaced.  Where the severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature shall match the old in design, color, texture, and other visual qualities and, where possible materials.  Replacement of missing features shall be substantiated by documentary, physical and pictorial evidence.

 

9.  New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property.  The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible in massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment.

 

10. New additions and adjacent or related new construction shall be undertaken in such a manner that if removed in the future the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would be unimpaired. 

 

Guidelines for Evaluating the Effect of Projects on Historic Buildings

Some exterior and interior alterations to a historic building are generally needed to assure its continued use, but it is most important that such alterations do not radically change, obscure, or destroy character-defining spaces, materials, features, or finishes. Alterations may include providing additional parking space on an existing historic building site; cutting new entrances or windows on secondary elevations; inserting an additional floor; installing an entirely new mechanical system; or creating an atrium or light well. Alteration may also include the selective removal of buildings or other features of the environment or building site that are intrusive and therefore detract from the overall historic character.

The construction of an exterior addition to a historic building may seem to be essential for the new use, but it is emphasized in the rehabilitation guidelines that such new additions should be avoided, if possible, and considered only after it is determined that those needs cannot be met by altering secondary, i.e., non character-defining interior spaces. If, after a thorough evaluation of interior solutions, an exterior addition

 

is still judged to be the only viable alterative, it should be designed and constructed to be clearly differentiated from the historic building and so that the character-defining features are not radically changed, obscured, damaged, or destroyed.

 

ADDITIONS

 

Recommended

 

Placing functions and services required for the new use in non-character-defining interior spaces rather than constructing a new addition.

 

Constructing a new addition so that there is the least possible loss of historic materials and so that character-defining features are not obscured, damaged, or destroyed.

 

Designing a new addition in a manner that makes clear what is historic and what is new.

 

Considering the design for an attached exterior addition in terms of its relationship to the historic building as well as the historic district or neighborhood. Design for the new work may be contemporary or may reference design motifs from the historic building. In either case, it should always be clearly differentiated from the historic building and be compatible in terms of mass, materials, relationship of solids to voids, and color.

 

Placing a new addition on a non-character-defining elevation and limiting the size and scale in relationship to the historic building.

 

Designing a rooftop addition when required for the new use that is set back from the wall plane and as inconspicuous as possible when viewed from the street.

 

Not Recommended

 

Expanding the size of the historic building by constructing a new addition when the new use could be met by altering non-character-defining interior spaces.

 

Attaching a new addition so that the character-defining features of the historic building are obscured, damaged, or destroyed.

 

Duplicating the exact form, material, style, and detailing of the historic building in a new addition so that the new work appears to be part of the historic building.  Imitating a historic style or period of architecture in a new addition.

 

Designing and constructing new additions that result in the diminution or loss of the historic character of the resource, including its design, materials, workmanship, location, or setting.

 

Designing a new addition that obscures, damages, or destroys character-defining features of the historic building.

 

Constructing a rooftop addition so that the historic appearance of the building is radically changed.

 

 

 

Downtown Design Guidelines

 

The City Commission and the Historic Resources Commission have adopted a set of Downtown Design Guidelines (2001) to review projects within the Downtown Urban Conservation Overlay District.  The guidelines that relate to this project are:

 

Development Patterns - The existing grid layout of streets and alleyways and other development patterns such as zero-building set back were established early in Lawrence’s development and are very important to the character of the Downtown.  Over time, the City of Lawrence has established additional development patterns that contribute to the character of Downtown such as the landscaping pattern along Massachusetts Street. Retention of these established patterns is important in maintaining the visual character and identity of Downtown Lawrence.

 

Guidelines

 

Existing street patterns and layout shall be maintained. Closure of existing streets shall not be permitted.

 

Alleyways shall be maintained for vehicular and/or pedestrian traffic.

 

Buildings fronting Massachusetts Street shall be constructed to zero front and side lot lines.

 

Exceptions may be made for architectural features such as recessed/projecting entries and balconies.

 

Buildings fronting Massachusetts Street should have a commercial/retail component at the storefront level.

 

Buildings fronting Massachusetts Street should reflect the party-wall construction pattern with adjacent buildings sharing a common party-wall.

 

New infill buildings should be multistory in height.

 

Buildings fronting Vermont and New Hampshire Streets should be constructed to zero front and side lot lines.

 

Buildings adjacent to historic structures listed on a register, such as the English Lutheran Church, shall respect the historic property by providing a transition between the proposed development and the historic property. The use of additional setback, green space and/or building height reduction are examples of appropriate transition elements.

 

Exceptions may be made for architectural features such as recessed/projecting entries and balconies.

 

Exceptions may be made for detached building forms which are traditionally set back from the property line.

 

Buildings fronting Numbered Streets (7th, 8th, etc.) shall be constructed to zero front and side lot lines.

 

Exceptions may be made for architectural features such as recessed/projecting entries and balconies.

 

Exceptions may be made for detached building forms which are

traditionally set back from the property line.

 

Streetscape Patterns - The Downtown Urban Design Principles, adopted by the City Commission, establish a number of design elements that relate to specific areas in Downtown Lawrence. Redevelopment, renovation and new construction shall reflect the existing and adopted streetscape patterns.

 

Guidelines

 

Massachusetts Street: Shall be primarily pedestrian-oriented with ancillary vehicular

circulation.

 

Sawtooth parking shall be maintained along Massachusetts Street.

 

Existing landscaping features such as raised planters and street trees shall be maintained.

 

Pedestrian-scale lighting shall be maintained.

 

Accent paving shall be used at intersections and mid-block crossings.

 

Vermont Street and New Hampshire Street: Shall define major vehicular movement

patterns.

 

On-street parking shall be parallel in orientation. Special consideration will be given for existing angle parking in the 600 block of Vermont Street.

 

Street trees and pedestrian-scale lighting shall be an integral part of the streetscape.

 

A curbed or non-curbed landscape bed shall separate the street and the pedestriansidewalk. The landscape strip shall be centered around the required street trees. An irrigation system shall be provided for all plant materials in the landscape bed. An agreement to participate in a benefit district for streetscape improvements may be executed in lieu of immediate improvements.

 

Numbered Streets (East-West Access): Shall promote pedestrian-oriented access while providing major and minor vehicular movement patterns.

 

On-street parking shall be parallel in orientation.

 

Street trees and pedestrian-scale lighting shall be an integral part of the streetscape.

 

A curbed or non-curbed landscape bed shall separate the street and the pedestrian sidewalk. The landscape strip shall be centered around the required street trees. An irrigation system shall be provided for all plant materials in the landscape bed. An agreement to participate in a benefit district for streetscape improvements may be executed in lieu of immediate improvements.

 

New Construction and Additions - Additions and new infill

construction must adhere to the patterns that prevail in nearby or adjacent structures.  Pattern is defined as the arrangement of form and the disposition of its parts or elements. It is always best to think of new construction as one element in a larger context.

 

The design guidelines for new construction and additions deal with the larger contextual issues. For design guidelines related to specific building elements, such as storefronts, refer to the appropriate section.

 

Guidelines

 

Facade Height:

 

Height must be considered as a dimension important to the structure, not just how the structure is related to adjacent buildings. The height of the building must be in proportion to its width and the story-to-story height of the building must be appropriate.

 

The height of new buildings and additions shall relate to the surrounding contributing buildings; avoid new construction that greatly varies in height from adjacent buildings.  A good rule of thumb is that new construction should not be more than two stories higher than adjacent contributing buildings.

 

Corner buildings should be higher than those that are interior to the block.

 

Corner buildings shall be a minimum of two-stories in height.

 

In infill construction, the facade width should fill the entire space.

 

Facade Width:

 

Facade widths for new buildings and additions should correspond with other buildings widths in the same block.

 

If the site is large, the mass of the facade should be broken into a number of smaller bays, to maintain a rhythm similar to surrounding buildings. This is particularly true for storefront level facade elements.

 

Composition:

 

The composition of the infill façade (that is, the organization of its parts) shall be similar to the surrounding facades in the block.

 

Rhythms that carry throughout the block (such as window spacing, etc.) shall be incorporated in the new facade.

 

The size and proportion of window and door openings of the new construction should be similar to other buildings in the block.

 

The ratio of window area to solid wall for new construction shall be similar to other buildings in the block.

 

New construction shall be constructed with party-wall construction methods.  Exceptions will be made for detached governmental, civic, or institutional buildings and when required by residential egress requirements.

 

Placement of Additions:

 

Primary consideration should be given to placing additions in the rear of existing structures.

 

Parking - Standards for the location and design of parking areas in Downtown Lawrence are critical to maintaining the visual appearance of the area.

 

Guidelines

 

General Parking Guidelines:

 

Parking lots/structures shall not be permitted to front Massachusetts Street unless the ground floor contains storefront uses. Existing surface parking areas fronting along Massachusetts Street should be infilled with appropriate new construction.

 

Surface-parking lots fronting New Hampshire and Vermont Streets shall be contained within the interior of the block.

 

Parking structures fronting New Hampshire and Vermont Streets should be contained within the interior of the block.  Exceptions will be made for parking structures that have commercial, retail or office uses on the ground floor.

 

Existing corner surface-parking areas fronting New Hampshire and Vermont Streets should be targeted for appropriate infill.

 

Surface Parking Lots:

 

Primary access to surface parking areas shall be taken from New Hampshire or Vermont Streets. The alleyway may be used for secondary access to the parking area.

 

While there is no established setback for surface parking areas, there should be a clear separation between vehicular parking areas and pedestrian areas. Pedestrian scale landscaping, fencing, and/or walls shall be provided to delineate the parking area from the pedestrian sidewalk.

 

Pedestrian-scale lighting shall be provided in surface parking areas.

 

While some interior landscaping shall be provided, surface-parking areas shall not be required to meet landscaping provisions set forth in 20-14A04.6 (a) of the City of Lawrence Zoning Code.

 

Surface-parking areas shall meet the provisions set forth in 20-1205 and 20-1217 of the City of Lawrence Zoning Code.

 

Parking Structures:

 

Primary access to the parking structures shall be taken from New Hampshire or Vermont Streets. The alleyway may be used for secondary access to the parking structure.

 

Parking structures should be constructed to zero-lot lines. Parking structures adjacent to registered historic structures, such as the English Lutheran Church or the Lucy Hobbs Taylor Building, shall respect the historic property by providing a transition between the proposed structure and the historic property. The use of additional setback, green space and/or building height reduction are examples of appropriate transition elements.

 

The inclusion of retail, commercial or office uses are encouraged at the ground floor of parking structures.

 

The primary facade of the parking structure should be designed to be compatible with neighboring buildings.

 

Parking structure facades should contain building materials consistent with the existing traditional building stock: brick, stone, terra cotta, etc.

 

Parking structures facades shall contain sufficient detail to break up the overall massing of the structure.

 

Parking structures shall meet the provisions set forth in 20-1205 and 20-1217 of the City of Lawrence Zoning Code.

 

Block Elements - Detached Building Forms - While detached building forms are not predominant in Downtown Lawrence, they can be found on corner sites and are usually limited to governmental, civic, office or institutional buildings. Detached building forms in the Downtown have unique design characteristics. Existing detached buildings shall maintain these characteristics, and construction of new detached building forms should reflect these characteristics.

 

Guidelines

 

Detached building forms should be set back from the property line. The setback, typically 3 feet to 5 feet, serves as a greenspace between the building and the sidewalk.

 

While detached building forms often have primary and secondary facades, the overall building design is usually carried throughout all of the facades. Unlike attached building forms, primary and secondary facades are not usually differentiated by a change in material but in the degree of architectural embellishment.

 

Detached building forms should have a high degree of architectural embellishment.

 

Facades- Traditional commercial facades have a three-part horizontal layering. 

 

Guidelines

 

Primary Facades:

Primary facades or front facades are facades that are oriented toward the primary street.

 

Primary facades shall employ an overall building design strategy exhibiting a) three-part horizontal layering; b) overall verticality; c) hierarchy; and

d) a balanced composition.

 

Storefront and display windows must be included in all retail developments.

 

Buildings should have a sense of unity and balance. In this drawing of a building in Downtown Lawrence, the second story windows and ornamentation on the second story create a pattern

 

because they have matching shapes and equal spacing.  Although there are two different stores at the street level, the strength of the second story gives the building unity.

 

Buildings with multiple storefronts within a larger building should be compatible from storefront to storefront.

 

Secondary Facades:

Secondary facades are facades of corner buildings that do not face the primary north/south street. For instance, a building located on the corner of Massachusetts Street and 7th Street has a secondary facade on 7th Street.

 

Secondary facades shall contain display windows and/or secondary storefronts.

 

Secondary facades shall contain upper story windows.

 

Secondary facades should be balanced in design and shall provide a distinction between lower and upper sections of the building.

 

Secondary facades should not directly compete with the primary facade.

 

Rear Facades:

While rear facades on older structures are more symmetrical in their design, more recent buildings provide a more utilitarian design approach. In most cases, rear entrances and openings occupy a relatively small part of the rear facade and exhibit more of a utilitarian character.

 

Rear facades should be maintained and developed to support the overall appearance of Downtown Lawrence.

 

Rear entrances on buildings that face public parking areas are encouraged.

 

Rear facades should provide sufficient architectural features, such as window and door openings, to articulate the building facade.

 

Rear facades should not compete with the primary facade of the structure.

 

Building Materials - The surface materials of a building are a key factor in its appearance and its relationship to adjacent buildings.

 

Guidelines

 

The original building material whether located on primary, secondary or rear facades, shall be retained when possible. If the original material has been overlaid by such coverings as aluminum or stucco, these alterations should be removed and the original material maintained, repaired or replaced with similar materials.

 

Primary Building Facade:

 

Building materials shall be traditional building materials consistent with the existing traditional building stock. Brick, stone, terra cotta, stucco, etc., shall be the primary facade materials for buildings fronting along Massachusetts Street.

 

While traditional building materials such as brick, stone, terra cotta, stucco, etc., are the preferred building materials for buildings fronting along New Hampshire, Vermont Street, or numbered streets, consideration will be given to other materials.

 

Storefront level and upper levels should have materials that are compatible.

 

Secondary and Rear Facade:

Building materials of secondary and rear facades are typically less costly than materials used on primary facades.

 

Secondary facades, which have primary facades facing Massachusetts Street, shall be composed of building materials consistent with the existing traditional building stock - brick, stone, terra cotta, stucco, etc.

 

While traditional building materials such as brick, stone, terra cotta, stucco, etc., are the preferred building materials for buildings fronting along New Hampshire, Vermont Street, or numbered streets, consideration will be given to other materials.

 

Party-walls or Shared Walls:

Building materials of party-walls or shared walls are typically less costly than materials used on primary and secondary facades. Rubble limestone, brick, tile block, and concrete block are common party-wall materials.

While permanent materials should be considered for party-wall construction, other materials which meet the associated building code and fire code requirements will be considered.

 

General Masonry:

Proper maintenance of masonry facades is an important part in maintaining the visual appearance and longevity of a building. Repointing and cleaning of a masonry structure should not be conducted without consulting a professional experienced in maintaining masonry structures.

 

Masonry walls, except in rare instances, shall not be clad with stucco, artificial stone, or EIFS (Exterior Insulation and Finish Systems). This includes publicly visible partywalls constructed of brick or rubble limestone.

 

Existing unpainted masonry walls, except in rare instances, shall not be painted. This includes publicly visible party-walls.

 

Existing Ornamentation - Existing ornamentation such as curved glass displays, terra cotta ornamentation, cast iron pilasters, glass transoms, and decorative tin cornices shall be maintained. Much of the character of Downtown Lawrence is due to the attention to detail evident in the brickwork, terra cotta, wrought iron, tin cornices and other embellishments. It is important to repair existing ornamentation when necessary and not detract from its effect by the addition or repair with inappropriate materials.

 

Guidelines

 

Architectural Details:

 

Intact original ornamentation or architectural details should be maintained and preserved. If original detailing is presently covered, exposing and restoring the features is encouraged.

 

 

Cornices:

 

Cornices shall not be removed unless such removal is required as a result of a determination by the Chief Building Inspector that a cornice poses a safety concern.

 

Original cornices should be repaired rather than replaced. If replacement is necessary, the new cornice should reflect the original in design.

 

New construction should provide for a variety of form, shape, and detailing in individual cornice lines.

 

Staff Analysis

 

Historical Background

According to the National Register of Historic Places nomination, the structure located at 200 W. 9th Street was constructed in 1904 with a grant from Andrew Carnegie.  The architect for the structure was George A. Berlinghof of Beatrice, Nebraska and the contractor was George A. Shaul of Seneca, Kansas.  The contract for the structure was for $20, 250 with a heating, plumbing, gas-fitting and electrical wiring addition to Graeber Bros. of Lawrence for $2, 200.  The building officially opened on December 26, 1904 with the actual cost of the building $24, 175 and the furniture, shelving, sidewalks and retaining walls raising the total costs to $27, 412.  By the 1930’s, the building was overcrowded and an addition was built in 1937.  By 1970, voters in the City of Lawrence approved a bond issue for a new library, which opened in 1972.  The structure was listed in the National Register of Historic Places on February 18, 1975 for significance in architecture and education.

 

South Elevation 200 W. 9Th Street – Carnegie Library

 

The original portion of the structure is a rectangular one-story, brick structure with a basement and architectural detailing that has been labeled “neo-classical” and “Beaux Arts.”  The main façade is accentuated by a central entrance with an impressive sequence of stone steps, an arched and coffered portico flanked by Corinthian columns, and a replacement wood front door. All four elevations of the original structure were symmetrically composed with major window surmounted by arches. Brick walls are embellished with band, cornices, window heads and sills, and other details of terracotta.  The roof is entirely concealed by a continuous parapet.  The 1936 addition is clearly distinct from the ornate original structure.  The addition does, however, continue some of the horizontal banding and the use of a terracotta cornice.  There is a parking lot to the north of the existing structure.

 

North Elevation

 

 

In several meetings with the architect for the applicant, the State Historic Preservation Office, and Planning Staff, it was determined that an addition to the existing structure is the most prudent alternative for this structure to achieve accessibility and meet modern code and practical standards for use as a public facility.  To achieve modern restrooms and an elevator in the existing structure, substantial loss of historic interior fabric and character-defining spaces would occur.  A new addition can house the modern needs of the structure with less intrusion.  Once it was established that a new addition would be the best solution for the existing structure, the focus centered on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards 9 and 10.

 

9.  New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property.  The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible in massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment.

 

10. New additions and adjacent or related new construction shall be undertaken in such a manner that if removed in the future the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would be unimpaired. 

 

The rehabilitation of the Carnegie Library is currently a State Tax Credit Project and a Save America’s Treasures grant project.  Final designs will be reviewed by the Kansas State Historic Preservation Office and the National Park Service for their compliance with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards.

 

Project Description

 

The new addition will be placed on the north elevation of the existing structure and will be attached to the historic structure with a small connector that will maintain the existing openings.  The proposed addition will be off set from the main structure by a 6’ connection and will be recessed from the eastern building plane by 15’ 10”. The proposed addition will measure 23’ X 47’ and will have a roof height that is approximately three (3) feet taller than the 1936 addition and in equal height to the eastern parapet of the original 1904 structure.   The proposed materials for the new addition will include cast stone foundations and brick and glass sheathing. A metal roof extension will project to the east from the new entrance. 

 

Project Analysis

 

The Carnegie Library is one of the most significant historic structures in the City of Lawrence.  The applicant’s architect has made a concerted effort to design an addition that meets the intent of the Secretary of the Interior’s Guidelines.  The new 1,202 square foot addition will clearly define what is historic and what is new.  It has been designed to minimize the loss of historic materials and not obscure, damage or destroy character-defining features of the original 1904 structure and the 1936 addition. The proposed addition is placed at the rear of the structure, the least character-defining elevation, and is set back from the original wall plane.  The size of the addition has been limited so that it is subordinate to the historic structure. The addition is connected to the historic structure by a small recessed hyphen and is designed in such a manner that if it were removed in the future the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would be unimpaired.  The proposed addition is compatible in terms of mass, materials, relationship of solids to voids, and color.

 

The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards are clear that new uses should require minimal change to the defining characteristics of the building.  Changes that create a false sense of historical development should be avoided, and distinctive features that characterize a historic property shall be preserved.  As proposed, the current project meets the intent of the new addition section of the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards.

 

The project architect and the Historic Resources Administrator met with the staff of the State Historic Preservation Office on September 12, 2006.  This final version of the design was presented. SHPO staff requested the project be submitted for review as it appears to meet the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards.  The lack of fenestration on the western elevation of the proposed addition was noted and was not of concern for the SHPO staff as this is a secondary elevation with a utilitarian interior use.  SHPO staff did note concern that the overall height and clearstory element of the proposed addition may diminish the prominence of the 1936 addition. 

 

Overall, staff is of the opinion that the proposed project meets the intent of the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards and the Downtown Design Guidelines.

 

 

D. STAFF RECOMMENDATION

 

In accordance with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards, the standard of evaluation, as well as the Downtown Design Guidelines, staff recommends the Commission approve the proposed project with the following conditions and make the determination that the proposed project does not encroach upon, damage or destroy any listed historic property or its environs.

 

1.      Complete construction documents with material notations, window details and trim details to be approved by the Architectural Review Committee and the Kansas Historic Preservation Office;

 

2.      Any changes to the approved project will be submitted to the Historic                  Resources Commission prior to the commencement of any related work. 

 

3.      The property owner will allow staff access to the property to photo document the project.