MINUTES OF A REGULAR
MEETING
OF THE
LAWRENCE-DOUGLAS
COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY
BOARD OF
COMMISSIONERS
January
28, 2008 Edgewood Homes
5:45 p.m.
Conference Room
1. Call
of Roll.
The meeting was called to order at 5:45 p.m. by Chairman Smith. Upon call of roll the following Commissioners answered
present:
Dave Clark
Brenda O’Keefe
Charlie Dominguez
Sonya Johnson
Wes Smith
Also
present were Beverly Hyatt, Charlotte Knoche, Milton Scott, Vickie Butler and
Barbara Huppee, LDCHA staff members.
2. A. Approve Minutes of the December 17, 2007 Board of Commissioners
Meeting.
Commissioner
Dominguez moved to approve the December Board minutes as presented. Chairman Smith seconded the motion. The motion carried.
3. Receive
Comments from Tenants and Public.
There
were no tenants or members of the public present.
4. Financial
Reports.
A. Receive November 2007 Public Housing
Financial Reports.
B. Receive November 2007 Clinton Place
Financial Reports.
C. Receive December Public Housing
Year-end Financial Reports.
D. Receive December Clinton Place Year-end Financial Reports.
E. Receive Section 8 Year-end Financial
Reports.
The
Year-end Financial Reports were not available for the meeting as they were still
in the process of being prepared by the agency’s fee accountant as part of the
2007 year end closeout. They will be
received at the February 25th meeting. The November reports were not presented at last
month’s meeting due to the early date of that meeting. They were enclosed this
month for the Board to review. The Board chose not to have a discussion of
the November financials as that information was not current but will be as part
of the December close-out reports presented next month in February. There
was no action taken on the financial agenda items.
5. CONSENT
AGENDA
A. Receive Executive Director’s Report.
There
being no discussion on the Executive Director’s Report, Commissioner Clark
moved to approve the Consent Agenda as presented. Chairman Smith seconded the
motion. The motion carried.
6. REGULAR AGENDA
A. Resolution 992: Receive Staff Proposal to the Community
Commission on Homelessness to Develop and Operate the Housing Connection.
Last
fall the Board was notified that the Community Commission on Homelessness (CCH) was seeking agencies to volunteer to develop
and implement a component of its plan to address homelessness in Lawrence. The CCH
stated that it would later issue a request for proposals from agencies that
wanted to develop one or more of the housing types listed in its plan. The LDCHA expressed interest in developing
and implementing the Temporary Housing Clearinghouse. The LDCHA has the space and the computer hard
and software to undertake this as an in-kind contribution. Ms. Huppee presented the LDCHA’s proposal to
the board. The clearinghouse has been
renamed by the CCH to the Housing
Connection. That is the name used in the
proposal. The proposal outlined the
responsibilities of the LDCHA in creating and operating the Housing
Connection. These included recruiting
landlords, property owners, and others to donate lease or otherwise make
available lodging for homeless persons for a period of time; to establish and
maintain a computer database of landlords and property donors; to make the
database available to case managers from local service agencies; to record and
tract placement of individuals in the respective units; to provide technical
assistance to landlords and donors including development of lease and contract
documents and training in property management; to monitor and account for cash
donations and other activities deemed necessary by the CCH.
Ms.
Huppee stated the CCH would like
to serve anybody that needs temporary housing as they are waiting to get permanent
housing. They propose that these people who come through the temporary housing
program have support services from the local service agencies. What the housing
authority would like to do is facilitate the matching of the landlords and
tenants and not run a housing program per se.
When a social service agency has an application, that application would
be given to the Housing Connection. The
Housing Connection would then match a landlord, which has a unit that would
meet conditions that have been previously established, with the applicant. Commission Johnson inquired if the match is
made, then the LDCHA is out of it? Also,
what is the LDCHA motivation for wanting to be part of this? Ms. Huppee replied that this is part of the
agency’s mission. As a housing provider,
the LDCHA sees this as a way for the agency to continue to provide services to
this population. Commission Dominguez asked what population she was referring to. Ms. Huppee replied, the homeless
population. If someone comes into this program
with support services, they may be able to become successful, obtain and
maintain housing. Commissioner Johnson stated that a lot of people that would
be coming through this process would be people that the housing authority
wouldn’t accept and would be that population that the housing authority would
not be working with anyway. Ms. Huppee
stated that they may be those the housing authority is not working with at that
moment in time; but if they were to get temporary housing and support services
and able to be successful then the housing authority would be able to house
them. The Board continued its discussion
including issues related to the proposed $55,673 budget, liability surrounding
criminal background checks and relationship of the housing authority to the CCH. The
two-hour discussion ended with the item being tabled so that Ms. Huppee could
submit the CCH proposal for legal
review. She stated she would email the
legal opinion to the Board. She also
stated that she would inform the CCH
that the housing authority’s proposal would be going back to the Board for a
second review in February.
B.
Discuss HUD-issued Amendment and Restated MTW
Agreement, Initial Staff Review of Possible Changes under the New Agreement and
Timeframe for Meeting Initial HUD Deadline.
The
Board has been aware that HUD was making significant changes to the MTW program and would be issuing a new standardized
MTW agreement for the 32 agencies
participating in the demonstration. The
new document was received and distributed to the board earlier this month. It was presented at the meeting. Ms. Huppee stated that the new restated
agreement had to be distributed to the public for a 30-day comment period after
which the Board had to hold a public hearing. Staff is not proposing any major revisions to
the current MTW
program that might be allowed under
the new authorizations before the 2009 Annual Plan process. Staff will conduct
a full analysis of the current MTW
program. Staff has said over time
weaknesses have been seen; but deferred taking any action as the agency was operating
on one-year agreements and didn’t see it as beneficial to undertake a massive
review if the program was going to be terminated. When the Board signs this amended and
restated agreement, it is not changing the agency’s current moving to work
program, only agreeing to the new conditions that HUD outlines. There are a number of things that are
different under this agreement. The
Annual Plan document will be different.
The report format will be totally different, due 90 days after the end
of the fiscal year. This amended
agreement gives the agency a lot of expanded authority with full discretion
over all reserves. The only rule that has to be followed is that any change has
to be covered under one of the expanded authorizations and has to go into the Annual
Plan and approved by HUD. The Annual Plan
must link proposed changes to one of the Congressional mandates. If this
agreement is not signed, then the LDCHA MTW
program ends in 2009. Commissioner
O’Keefe asked if there were any changes on the tenant side of it, as far as
rent. Ms. Huppee stated that would be part of the agency review, and staff will
look at the rent structure with the full expansive public participation process
again this time, as was first done. Ms.
Huppee stated that a board member should participate in that review, because if
dramatic changes are recommended it would be important to have a board member
be part of that discussion. Commission
O’Keefe stated that she definitely would like to be a part of that review not
only as a board member but also as a tenant participant. Commissioner Dominguez asked to be kept
informed of the internal review. Ms.
Huppee stated the board will be kept informed all along the way and invited Commissioner
Dominguez to be on the committee. Chairman Smith moved to send the amended and
restated MTW agreement out for
public comment. Commissioner Johnson
seconded the motion. The motion passed
unanimously.
7. Calendar and Announcements.
There were no announcements.
8. Adjournment.
There
being no further items of business, Commissioner Dominguez moved to
adjourn. Chairman Smith seconded the
motion. The meeting was adjourned at 7:30 p.m.
________________________________ _____________________________
Chairman Secretary Attest