City of
MEMBERS PRESENT: |
|
MEMBERS ABSENT: |
Becky McClure Steve Guinn |
STAFF PRESENT: |
None |
PUBLIC PRESENT: |
None |
Fire Station Number 5
The committee discussed improvements to the
1) The section of
2) The existing bike route on
3) The existing bike route from 6th
and
a. Signage to this effect is recommended.
4) The existing bike route from West
22nd to 23rd via Kasold should be marked as a future recreation
path.
5) West 22nd connecting
Kasold to
a. Signage to this effect is desired.
6) The existing recreation path on
Kasold from 23rd to 15th should be shown as a future recreation
path.
7) Clarification is needed regarding
the recreation path along
a. Specifically, is the path along
Waverly or is construction pending?
b. Does the existing recreation path
continue along
8) Clarification is needed regarding
the bike lane between 6th and Peterson, along
a. Specifically, does a bike lane
already exist or should the map designate this section as future bike lane?
9) Clarification is needed regarding
the “new” section of the
a. The Committee recommends that this
segment addition be designated as an existing recreation path.
b. Specifically, shall this be shown
as Corps’ property?
The committee discussed improvements to Lawrence Bicycle
Facility Map for that area referred to as
Where appropriate, please make the same changes as outlined
in Discussion Item #4.
1) Please show the
2) Please clarify the Prairie Park/Mary’s
6. Discussion Item: Review of the Burroughs
Creek Map (Bartlett and West Engineers)
Discussion ensued regarding updates from the first public
planning meeting. Currently, there is no
funding allotted for this project. Two
unique maps of proposed routes were presented. The Committee recommended the
following changes using a draft map:
1) Removing redundancy of the
southwest-bound appendage, since funding is limited, at the moment. Please see map for clarification.
2) Adding a 16th street
connector, as indicated in yellow on the map.
3) Connecting the northeast end of the
trail to city land, with the ultimate goal of connecting the Two Rivers Trail
and
The Committee recommended a paved, concrete trail is the
goal, but a limestone, or “chip rock”, path would be acceptable, to establish a
path and to facilitate immediate civilian usage.
If the entire proposed section cannot be paved at once, the
committee recommended that sections of trail be paved in correspondence to
population density; sections adjacent to denser populations should be paved prior
to sections adjacent to less dense populations.
This is intended to; 1) accommodate those desiring to use the trail with
wheelchairs and/or strollers and 2) accommodate a higher percentage of the
local population.
7. Other Business: No other business was discussed.
8. Adjournment: The meeting was adjourned by Eric Struckhoff
at
Next
meeting: