PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
June 26 & 28, 2006
Meeting Minutes - DRAFT
PC Minutes
ITEM NO. 2A : USE PERMITTED UPON REVIEW FOR
EXPANSION AT
UPR-04-04-06:
Use Permitted upon Review request for the expansion
of
PC Minutes
ITEM NO. 2B : FINAL PLAT FOR
PF-05-13-06: Final Plat for
Items 2A & 2B were
discussed simultaneously
STAFF PRESENTATION
Ms. Pool introduced the items, a UPR and a Final
Plat for expansion and modification of
In Staff’s opinion, further evaluation of several
Master Plan elements was needed and, therefore, deferral of the UPR was
recommended. Specific elements Staff
would like to review further included:
Staff supported the proposed vacation of
right-of-way within the 300 block of
APPLICANT
PRESENTATION
C.L. Mauer, Landplan Engineering, spoke on behalf
of the applicant. He said the applicant
had recently met with the Transit Advisory Board. The Board expressed no opposition to the
proposal and indicated that changing the transit route to go through the
hospital property would improve transit service in the area. The applicant was not able to get these comments
in writing in time for this meeting.
Regarding drainage issues, the applicant was
unclear as to what additional information Staff wanted. Mr. Mauer explained how existing drainage
problems would be improved with this proposal.
Other points were made:
Mr. Mauer said the applicant knew that additional
work with Staff will be needed, but would like to continue moving forward in
the process. He responded to questioning
that deferral of both the UPR and Final Plat could potentially keep the
applicant from pulling a building permit in August as needed to complete the
proposal before the construction season ended.
It was clarified that the next project phase included internal building
renovations. Mr. Mauer explained that
parking changes would need to happen concurrently with the internal changes to
consistently provide usable parking areas.
Haase pointed out that the “improved” bus routes
could be accomplished even without this proposal and asked why the transit
service did not make these changes before.
Mr. Mauer was not able to address this specific question, but said the
Transit Advisory Board had not recognized this potential for improved services
until they looked at this proposal.
It was discussed that the hospital grounds are
owned by the City of
Harris asked if the applicant had considered
keeping
Ms. Stogsdill provided clarification on why Staff
was willing to recommend approval of a Final Plat that vacated right-of-way
when the street design was in question.
She said vacating the right-of-way changed setback requirements, giving
the applicant flexibility to manipulate parking arrangements. She added that this r-o-w vacation did not give
the hospital board full control of the parking lot design– the City maintained
the authority to review site plans for all expansions or modifications of the
site. Staff recommendation for deferral
of the UPR was based on the evolving Hospital Master Plan – the plan had simply
not been stable long enough for proper review by staff and ample time had not
been provided for input from the neighborhood.
Ms. Stogsdill responded to questioning that Staff
could attempt to complete the necessary review in time for the July meeting,
but a deferral to August might be more realistic.
PUBLIC
HEARING – on UPR only
Kelly Driscoll, area resident, said she was happy to see
growth in the area, but noted that residents were overpowered by hospital
property in this part of the Pinckney Neighborhood. Ms. Driscoll said not many people were going
to be as directly impacted as she would be by this project, and they had not
been given adequate notice (time) to respond to the latest version of the plan.
Ms. Driscoll referenced previous comments that but
stops were not located on private property, saying there was a bus stop sign
directly in front of her house. She also
asked about the possibility of a stop light at 4th & Maine
Streets, saying this was completely unnecessary. She asked if the placement of this stop light
would remove mature trees from her yard, which provided her only visual barrier
to the hospital.
Mehrdad Givechi, traffic engineer for the project,
clarified that no new traffic signals were proposed as part of this
project. The Level of Service at these
intersections would be improved using other measures (Ex. left-turn lanes). If traffic volumes required additional
measures, a 4-way stop would be considered.
The newest addendum to the application included these elements (this
addendum was provided after the Staff Report and Commissioner packets were
complete).
Burress asked Mr. Givechi to discuss with Ms.
Driscoll how the traffic changes would impact her property.
Gwen Klingenberg spoke on behalf of the Pinckney Neighborhood
Association, agreeing with previous speakers that the plan had changed
significantly since the neighborhood had seen it last and that more review time
was needed.
APPLICANT
CLOSING COMMENTS
Mr. Mauer responded to the previous speaker’s
concerns, saying the applicant was willing to work with the City to improve
STAFF
CLOSING COMMENTS
Staff had no additional comments.
COMMISSION
DISCUSSION
Burress asked what steps could be taken to improve
neighborhood notice. Staff said the most
important step in that process was to provide adequate review time with a
static plan. In this case, changes were
happening too frequently to keep the neighborhood up-to-date on each
revision. This was the basis for Staffs’
recommendation for deferral.
Ms. Stogsdill responded to questioning that a
one-month deferral would be challenging for Staff, but they would do their best
to complete the necessary review on that schedule, provided the applicant could
supply the needed information.
It was discussed that approving the Final Plat
gave the applicant and Staff a footprint to work with. Burress said he was uncomfortable vacating
right-of-way without seeing a development plan.
He was hesitant to change the existing grid street pattern without seeing
how the new street design would work.
Burress spoke about the value of the grid street
pattern as a highly-adaptable system, providing many alternative routes for
traffic.
Item 2A
Motioned by Eichhorn, seconded by Harris to defer
Item 2A to the July 2006 meeting.
Motion carried
unanimously, 9-0
Item 2B
Motioned by Eichhorn, seconded by Finkeldei to
approve the Final Plat for Lawrence Memorial Hospital Addition and forward it
to the City Commission with a recommendation for approval, subject to the
following conditions:
1.
Provision of the following fees and documentation:
a.
A current copy of a paid property tax receipt.
b.
Recording fees made payable to the Douglas County Register of Deeds.
c.
A completed Master Street Tree Plan in accordance with Section
21-708a.3.
d.
A Temporary Utility Agreement.
2.
Pinning of both
lots in accordance with Section 21-302.2 of the Subdivision Regulations.
3.
Revision of the plat to include the following:
a.
Notation of vacation of
b.
Notation of which easements are existing and proposed.
c.
Additional utility easements to accommodate the sanitary sewer and
water mains as shown on the City’s Geographic Information Systems map.
d.
Notation of the 80-foot utility easement within the vacated
e.
Additional drainage easements to accommodate the stormwater mains as
shown on the City’s Geographic Information Systems map.
f.
Notation of the off-site drainage easements along the northern and
eastern sides of Woody Park.
g.
Notation of the Floodplain Overlay District which touches Woody Park.
h.
Notation of the long-term lease with
Motion carried 5-4, with
Eichhorn, Finkeldei, Haase,