ITEM NO. 4: L-02-01-2006
STAFF REPORT
A. SUMMARY
L-02-01-2006: Hold public hearing for
consideration of placing the structure located at
B. HISTORIC REGISTER STATUS
C. REVIEW CONSIDERATIONS
1) History Summary
According to the nomination, the
structure was constructed between 1868 and 1870. While the architect/builder of the structure
is not known, the house does show on the 1873 Atlas with no name. The nomination notes that the property was
originally held by the New England Emigrant Aid Company and was deeded to –
unimproved – to Adams & Ayling in 1862.
The In 1868 Green Lewis contracted to by the property and it is presumed
due to the increase in property values that he built the existing structure
sometime between 1868 and 1870. The
property is now owned by the Nicolette Proudfoot.
2) Architectural Integrity
Summary
The nomination application notes at
least three known alterations to the structure including the historic addition by
Overton noted in the nomination.
3) Context Description
820 New Jersey Street is a good
example of the housing that was constructed in Lawrence during the “City
Building (1864-1873)” period as defined by the Historic Resources of Lawrence,
Douglas County, Kansas Multiple Property Documentation Form (MPDF).
The area surrounding
4)
This area was rezoned in 1975 from
C-4 to RM-2. The lots as originally
platted are small 118 X 50 foot lots. The area north of this block is C-4, M-2,
and RM-2. The area south of this block
is zoned RM-2 and C-4. The area to the
east is industrial zoned M-2 and M-3 and the area to the west is RM-2.
5) Fiscal Comments
There are no monetary benefits
directly associated with nomination of a structure to the Lawrence Register of
Historic Places.
However, listing on the local
Register does help preserve built resources important to
The original information submitted
with nominations for properties to the Lawrence Register is kept on file in the
City
6) Positive/Negative Effects
of the Designation
The positive effect of designation
is the creation of a permanent record of the historical significance of an
individual property, for its architectural quality or its association with a
significant local individual or event.
This provides the local Historic Resources Commission, an advisory
board, with pertinent historical data which can help to provide an ‘historic'
perspective to property owners when they desire to improve, add on, or
redevelop a property within an older section of the City.
The public accessibility of this
information is also a resource as it can be used by realtors,
builders/developers, and others in the community prior to a property's resale,
redevelopment or rehabilitation. In a
more general sense, this information can be used by the Chamber of Commerce and
existing businesses and industries to ‘identify' one of the facets that makes
up Lawrence's Quality of Living.
Additional effects of designation
are the creation of an arbitrary, 250' environs notification and review area.
Within this 250' circle, projects which require city permits, e.g., demolition,
redevelopment, renovation or modification, require review by Historic Resources
staff or the Commission. These environs
reviews permit scrutiny of proposed development/redevelopment by individuals
sensitive to historic preservation.
A Certificate of Appropriateness or a Certificate of Economic Hardship is required to be issued by the
Historic Resources Commission before a City permit can be issued for the
proposed project. If the Historic
Resources Commission denies a Certificate
of Appropriateness or a Certificate
of Economic Hardship, the property owner can appeal to the City Commission
for a new hearing. The City Commission can
uphold the decision of the
The local ordinance 250' environs
review area is exceeded by State law with regard to State and/or National
Register properties. Certificates of
Appropriateness or Economic Hardship are required for a project within the 250'
radius of a Local Register property.
Examples of projects which would
require review and approval are: projects involving the exterior
building which are considered ‘structural' changes, demolitions or partial
demolitions, rezonings, replats, site plans, variance requests or other items
which require a city permit or are the direct result of an action of the City
Commission. Minor changes which require
a city permit can be administratively approved by the Historic Resources
Administrator.
7) Summary of Applicable
Designation Criteria
Chapter 22, of the City Code is the
Conservation of Historic Resources Code
for the City of
D. CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION AND
DESIGNATION - Section 22-403
Nine criteria are provided within
this section for review and determination of qualification as a Landmark or
Historic District. These criteria are
set forth below with staff's recommendations as to which this application
qualifies for:
(1) Its character, interest, or value as part of
the development, heritage or cultural characteristics of the community, county,
state, or nation;
820 New Jersey Street is a good
example of the plain traditional style of building that was constructed by the working
population of Lawrence during the “City Building” period as defined by the
Historic Resources of Lawrence, Douglas County, Kansas Multiple Property
Documentation Form (MPDF).
(2) Its location as a site of a
significant local, county, state, or national event;
(3) Its identification with a
person or persons who significantly contributed to the development of the
community, county, state, or nation;
(4) Its embodiment of distinguishing
characteristics of an architectural style valuable for the study of a period,
type, method of construction, or use of indigenous materials;
(5) Its identification as a work
of a master builder, designer, architect, or landscape architect whose
individual work has influenced the development of the community, county, state
or nation;
(6)
Its
embodiment of elements of design, detailing, materials, or craftsmanship that
render it architecturally significant;
(7) Its embodiment of design
elements that make it structurally or architecturally innovative;
(8) Its unique location or
singular physical characteristics that make it an established or familiar
visual feature;
(9) Its character as a
particularly fine or unique example of a utilitarian structure; including, but
not limited to farmhouses, gas stations, or other commercial structures, with a
high level of integrity or architectural significance.
-------------------------
The HISTORIC RESOURCES CODE
establishes a procedure to follow in the forwarding of a recommendation to the
City Commission on applications for listing on the local register.
"Following the hearing the commission shall adopt by resolution a
recommendation to be submitted to the city commission for either (a)
designation as a landmark or historic district; (b) not to designate as a landmark
or historic district; or, (c) not to make a recommendation. The resolution shall be accompanied by a
report to the city commission containing the following information:
The Historic Resources Commission
needs to formulate its recommendation in response to the following subsections
section 22-404.2 (b):
(1) Explanation of the
significance or lack of significance of the nominated landmark or historic
district as it relates to the criteria for designation as set forth in section
22-403;
(2) Explanation of the
integrity or lack of integrity of the nominated landmark or historic district;
(3) In the case of a
nominated landmark found to meet the criteria for designation:
(A) The significant exterior
architectural features of the nominated landmark that should be protected; and,
(B) The types of
construction, alteration, demolition, and removal, other than those requiring a
building or demolition permit, that cannot be undertaken without obtaining a
certificate of appropriateness.
(4) In the case of a nominated
historic district found to meet the criteria for designation:
(A) The types of significant
exterior architectural features of the structures within the nominated historic
district that should be protected;
(B) The types of
construction, alteration, demolition, and removal, other than those requiring a
building or demolition permit, that cannot be undertaken without obtaining a
certificate of appropriateness.
(C) A list of all key
contributing, contributing and noncontributing sites, structures and objects
within the historic district.
(5) Proposed design
guidelines for applying the criteria for review of certificates of
appropriateness to the nominated landmark or historic district.
(6) The relationship of the
nominated landmark or historic district to the on-going effort of the
commission to identify and nominate all potential areas and structures that
meet the criteria for designation.
(7) A map showing the
location of the nominated landmark or the boundaries of the nominated historic
district.
E. RECOMMENDATION: