Memorandum
City of
Public Works
TO: |
Dave Corliss |
FROM: |
Chuck Soules |
CC: |
Debbie Van Saun, |
Date: |
June 30, 2006 |
RE: |
July 11, 2006
Agenda Item George Williams Way
Benefit Districts |
Attached are three benefit districts for:
Benefit District #1. GWW
south of
The method of assessment is per square footage.
The improvements at the
intersection of
The resolution proposes that the City-at-large contribute $100,000 for these improvements and the benefit district pay for 100% of the remaining costs.
Benefit District #2. The
final/ultimate lane configuration for GWW north of
The method of assessment is per front footage.
The improvements at the
intersection at
The resolution proposes that the City-at-large contribute $100,000 for these improvements and the benefit district will pay for 100% of the remaining costs.
Benefit District #3. GWW
north of
The method of assessment is by front footage.
The improvements will be paid 100% by the benefit district with no City-at-large participation.
All these benefit districts include a 6’ sidewalk on one side of the street and a 10’ recreational path on the opposite side.
The City and State spent over $14
million on the improvements to
Typically, when improvements are needed for intersections due to development, the development pays for most, if not all of the cost associated with the project:
31st & Nieder |
All costs paid by benefit district. |
34th & |
All costs paid by adjacent business (Wal-Mart). |
33rd & |
Several projects requiring changes in this intersection were paid for by the development. |
31st & |
City, State, and development cost share project. The intersection needed improvements to accommodate existing traffic, a well as expansion to accommodate new development. |
6th & Comet |
All costs paid by benefit district. |
Context sensitivity: The proposed improvements are significant in magnitude. The City has been discussing ways to be more pedestrian friendly and slow traffic down; however, the intersection of two arterial streets does need to be able to handle the anticipated capacity otherwise motorists will find other ways around congested areas (i.e., cut through neighborhoods) or become frustrated.
There are some designs/options that should be explored/evaluated. When the engineering firm is selected for the design of the improvements, one task will be to include options providing a context sensitive environment. Some examples could include reducing the lane widths and widening medians for pedestrian refuges, landscaping and/or moving sidewalks to the outside edges of right-of-way and providing trees/landscaping between the sidewalk and curb.
Please let me know if additional information is needed.
Respectfully submitted,
Charles F. Soules, P.E
Director of Public Works
CFS/je