From: Michael S Almon [paradigm@ixks.com]
Sent: Friday, June 02, 2006 1:41 PM
To: Paul Patterson
Cc: Sheila Stogsdill; Bobbie Walthall
Subject: Re: 03-28-06 Corrected CC Minutes
Sheila Stogsdill wrote:
> Paul --
>
> Please correct and ask Bobbie to repost to CC agenda. Thanks.
>
> Sheila
Hi Paul:
Just curious, will these corrections be made soon, so as to be of any consequence?
Thanks for your attention,
Michael Almon
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael S Almon [mailto:paradigm@ixks.com]
> Sent: Friday, June 02, 2006 7:57 AM
> To: Sheila Stogsdill
> Cc: Paul Patterson; Klingenberg, Gwendolyn; Mansur, Beth Anne;
> Grauerholz, James ; Heckler, Richard; Brown, Aaron ; Comstock, Craig ;
> Noever, Rhetta J; Good, Janet; Tomc, Matt
> Subject: 6 June 06 CC agenda Item #9(b) SP-03-27-06
>
>
> Hello Sheila:
> Thank you for your comments about how land use conditions might be
> attached to the Salvation Army site plan SP-03-27-06. However, I am
> submitting an addition to your 1 June Staff Report about this item
> (attached herein). While you have discussed the enforceability of such
> conditions and have included the Salvation Army version of such
> conditions, I am astonished that nowhere under Agenda Item #9(b) have
> you included the Neighborhood Coalition proposal for such site plan
> conditions. Instead, an untitled version is buried in the "rezoning"
> part of #9(a) under the generic caption of "correspondence".
>
> The Salvation Army proposal is a nine-item list of "commitments" that
> are legally quite non-specific and contain no periodic review
> provisions. The Eastside Neighborhood Coalition proposal includes a
> nine-item list of legally worded use activities, specific time
> constraints and surrogate UPR review and revocation provisions, and
> definitions of terminology.
>
> Both proposals were discussed at the 3 May 2006 negotiation session
> between the Salvation Army and the Eastside Neighborhood Coalition.
> Both proposals are on the table. To avoid the appearance of favoritism
> towards the Salvation Army, I think you would be wise to present both
> proposals in the City Commission agenda on equal footing: that is
> equally identified, equally accessible , and equally referenced and
> evaluated in your Staff Report.
>
> Please revise your staff report accordingly, and include as
> "Attachment B" the "Neighborhood Coalition Proposed Site Plan
> Conditions", or at the
>
> very least, make it an identified item under Agenda Item #9(b) along
> with the other site plan attachments.
>
> Also, please include this e-mail as an attachment under Agenda Item
> #9(b).
>
> thanks so much for your work,
> Michael Almon
>
>
>
>
> Subject: 03-28-06 Corrected CC Minutes
>
>
> Hello again Sheila:
> Please include the corrected minutes of the City Commission from 28
> March 2006 under Agenda Item #9(a) for the 6 June 2006 meeting agenda
> (attached herein).
>
> The attached "Excerpt from the City Commission Minutes dated 3/28/06"
> include my comments made that evening regarding initiation of rezoning
> of the Salvation Army property. Your currently posted minutes excluded
> my comments, though part of the official minutes.
>
> Please correct the 03-28-06 Minutes accordingly, and include under
> Agenda Item #9(a) as posted for next Tuesday's agenda, 6 June 2006.
>
> Thanks again,
> Michael Almon